I think that Sheffield 189 and 264 deserve better than being parked in limbo land for ever. We have a Trams Report and Attitude Statements but what is the Society's policy towards these trams?
The need to find secure accomodation for 189 was an important consideration in the decision to acquire the Crich site. 264 and 812 bore the brunt on the midweek service many years ago. 812 was then rebuilt and is still in service but 264 was withdrawn awaiting reconstruction and seemingly forgotten.